News Index Last comments Archives Login...Register...

Search

9th April 2005

DUP Propagandist Moves from Newspaper to Election Campaign

Permalink 05:29:33 pm, Categories: News, Northern Ireland, Politics, Election 2005, 1061 words  

CHRISTOPHER Stalford wrote his last article in the Newsletter today. I for one am glad, as I'm not sure I could take much more of his bland column which, for the last couple of weeks during which time I've read it, did little more than regurgitate DUP propaganda. He's so good he could nearly work for Sinn Fein.

Today's column enraged me. He bgins by saying that he's leaving and that apparently the Newsletter is now sufficiently pro-DUP for his liking. Apparently the paper had previously been criticised for only being reperesetnative of pro-agreement, pro-Trimble unionism. Apparently now "all shades of unionist political opinion are given a fair hearing on the pages of this publication". It's obviously just my own misapprehension that caused me to think this morning, as I walked to the shop, how biased towards the DUP the paper has seemed in the past few weeks!! (I only started reading it, in preference to the Belfast Telegraph, in the last few weeks)

He then goes on to give a shamefully inaccurate account of what has happened in Northern Ireland over the last year. Apparently "Sinn Fein/IRA, so used to getting their own way, dictating to unionists and reaping concessions... have been humiliated, exposed and played off the proverbial field by the [DUP]." If you say so Chris!

[More:]

Has he been awake for the past 12 months? I'd love to know exactly how SF have been "humiliated" or "exposed" and how exactly the DUP have "played them off" whatever field it is he's talking about, especially as they appear set to romp home to victory in the coming elections - the DUP themselves say that SF are in danger of topping the poll!! Played off the field eh?

"Gerry Adams, used to strutting around the White House, was reduced to doing tours of the 'Oirish' bars in New Jersey."

My good friend Christopher neglects to mention that the main reason for this has been the murder of Robert McCartney, but sure why let the truth get in the way of a good propaganda piece?

"In Paisley, villified unfairly for years, now straddles the world stage as the elder statesman of unionism and enjoys much greater respect and standing than David Trimble ever did."

Really? Funny I got the impression Ian Paisley was still viewed by the outside world as the out of date fossil he is. A global embarrassment to unionists. As for greater respect/standing than Trimble - Trimble won a Nobel peace prize for his efforts in making Northern Ireland a better place. What exactly has Paisley done to earn the supposed greater respect and/or standing that Stalford speaks of? Would that be the time he was quoted as saying he would kill anyone who stood in his way all those years ago? I'll be fair, if he has apologised for that remark please let me know, but somehow it doesn't seem like the Rev to admit he's made a mistake. I think his "villification" as Chris puts it, was totally justified.

Apparently "the DUP has worked hard to consolidate international opinion around the position that there can be no place in government for Sinn Fein, while that party remains wedded to IRA violence."

Again, I think international opinion was changed much more substantially by the Northern Bank raid and the McCartney incident than anything the DUP have (or lets face it, haven't) done. In fact I'd say the Irish government's attitude towards and criticism of the IRA/Sinn Fein has done much more to harm their image than anything the DUP have done - after all we've heard it all before from them and it's what we've come to expect. As for "no place in government for Sinn Fein," Christopher seems to have conveniently forgotten about the fact that in December, the DUP were a couple of photographs away from enetering into a government with Sinn Fein where the potential was there not only for Sinn Fein to take charge of our schools and hospitals, but also our police force! But again, it's ok, people will believe what you tell them, won't they Chris?

He goes on to suggest voters should compare the DUP's record of achievement with that of the Ulster Unionists. I've no problem with that, they definitely should, but not Stalford's version of events. "Trimble jumped ship 3 times at the behest of the provos, and fell flat on his face. During the DUP's watch, SF/IRA hasn't been in government for one minute because the party knew the provos couldn't be trusted."

Lets look at the DUP record first. Not much there, I don't think anything has been achieved since they won the assembly elections. I refer you back to the fact that only a couple of photos kept SF out of government. Would a couple of photos, which could easily be faked, have suddenly meant that SF were trustworthy?

Now the UU record: Stalford says Trimble "jumped and fell flat on his face". Trimble gave the republican movement a chance to show that it had changed and was ready to become a full partner in a democratic political system. The fact that SF proved unworthy of that trust is neither here nor there - for the sake of Northern Ireland Trimble gave it a go. To accuse the man of jumping ship because he took a chance to make his country a better place, is more than a touch harsh.

I'm sure many of you remember what life was like before the GFA and the ceasefires in 1994. Bomb scares and shootings on a regular basis. The Republic of Ireland with a constitutional claim on our homeland. Both these have been changed, thanks to a deal which the DUP, to this day, claim to reject (despite their deal being essentially the same with even more concessions to SF/IRA!)

If this column, and his column last week, is anything to go by, I'm thankful there won't be anymore. I just hope, for the sake of the people of Laganbank (where Christopher Stalford is now standing for election to Belfast City Council), that enough decent people turn out to vote for other candidates that he doesn't get into power. Here's a hint, the Alliance seem to do a good job on a local level, if current Lord Mayor Tom Ekin is anything to go by anyway.

Comments:

Comment from: David Vance [Visitor] · http://www.atangledweb.typepad.com
Beano,

I think that party aligned columnists are a bad idea - regardless of WHOSE party they represent. Surely it should be the originality and interest that the columnist can create that comes first - not which cabal they represent? Oh well - I'm sure that will be ignored by the powers that be but it would be better if it was not.
Permalink 9th April 2005 @ 18:25
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
I don't have a problem with party-aligned columnists per se, as long as there is representation from more than one party and those who write are articulate and write about facts, not fiction.

That said, a neutral (in party terms) column is probably more likely to write something original rather than spouting the party line, and is probably preferable.

I'll admit that I am more sympathetic to the UUs than the DUP, and my article I'm sure reflects that. I'm not blindly loyal to the UUP though and if I thought the DUP were a better alternative I'd support them. I just see the moderate views of the UUs or even the Alliance as preferable to the political protestantism currently eminating from the DUP.
Permalink 9th April 2005 @ 19:30
Comment from: David Vance [Visitor] · http://www.atangledweb.typepad.com
I am all in favour of a diveristy of opinions - which is why I wish that the NI press had the guts to take a risk with let us say more controversial columnists. I hate the regurgitation of party political lines through alleged independent commentators - it's more fun to challenge, to enquire, to take off at an angle. I think Unionism is capable of withstanding this but perhaps the Editors in high places know otherwise?
Permalink 9th April 2005 @ 22:25
Comment from: Christopher Stalford [Visitor]
Dear Beano

Always nice to meet a fan. I think you need to check the article again - at no point did I say that Trimble "jumped ship" - I said he jumped and fell flat on his face.

I would recommend you read Dean Godson's book - the chapter pertaining to the failed "sequence" just prior to the November election demonstrates more elequontly than anything I could write, just how inept your beloved Ulster Unionist Party were when they were in charge of Unionism.

Futhermore, you should really try to avoid historical revisionism. In December when the deal fell through because of the IRA's refusal to decommission totally, the international media consensus was (for the very first time) that Sinn Fein/IRA, not Unionists were to blame for the impasse. This was in sharp contrast to when Trimble was at the helm - Unionists were encouraged to jump and then portrayed as the bad guys when the executive collapsed.

You are right to point out that subsequent events such as the Northern Bank raid and the brutal murder of Robert McCartney have further damaged Sinn Fein's standing, but those events occurred after the publication of the Comprehensive Agreement. These events have vindicated the DUP's analysis that Sinn Fein cannot be trusted and must not be in government - we didn't need three botched go's at governing Ulster with them to find out they were criminals.

Thank you for your criticism - it's always welcome.

Permalink 11th April 2005 @ 11:14
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
Thanks for paying a visit here Christopher, I'm glad to hear your feedback and glad you consider it worthwhile fighting your corner. For what it's worth, I at least appreciate your willingness to discuss the points made.

I apologise if I misquoted you on the jumping ship remark. I have amended that and will certainly re-read the column when I get home.

For the record, I don't consider the UUs my "beloved Ulster Unionist Party," but I am frustrated at the lack of alternatives - Paisleyism/political protestantism is of no interest to me as an agnostic.

I also dislike the way the DUP are fighting this campaign, focusing more on trying to destroy the UUs than any real issues (and also frustrated that the UUs seem to be trying to fight back rather than take the initiative!) As you can see from the next post in my blog - despite being more UU (or even Alliance) than DUP I'm more interested in the real problems facing Northern Ireland than the intra-sect bickering that's going on.
Permalink 11th April 2005 @ 11:47
Comment from: Christopher Stalford [Visitor]
One final point Beano - propagandist? Surely not!
Permalink 11th April 2005 @ 15:42
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
I thought very carefully about the choice of headline - reading your article my initial instinct was that it fitted neatly into the category of propaganda, since there was little factual basis in most of it and it deliberately (and somewhat legitimately, since it was an opinion column) span everything to bring the DUP up smelling of roses.

I refer you to Dictionary.com which defines propaganda as:
The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause.
Permalink 11th April 2005 @ 16:20
Comment from: Christopher Stalford [Visitor]
The point of me being there was to give a DUP point of view in order to balance Alex Kane. I'll admit Alex would criticise his party openly - and fairly so - but I don't feel the need to do likewise to the DUP.
Permalink 11th April 2005 @ 16:58
Comment from: Christopher Stalford [Visitor]
If my brief was to bring a DUP POV don't be annoyed when you get one!
Permalink 11th April 2005 @ 16:59
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
I'm not annoyed, just pointing out what I think are the flaws in the "logic" behind your column. My 'brief' is to put forward my POV ;)

I found the column drifted away, in my opinion, from bringing a DUP POV towards spouting the DUP party line without much basis behind it, which you are entitled to do, but I think I am entitled to challenge it.
Permalink 11th April 2005 @ 17:08
Comment from: Christopher Stalford [Visitor]
That's why we live in a democracy. Anyway, all the best with your blog!
Permalink 11th April 2005 @ 18:28
Comment from: Traditional Unionist [Visitor]
I don't feel the need to do likewise to the DUP.


you reckon you'd get away with it if you did feel the need?
Permalink 12th April 2005 @ 15:54
Comment from: Andrew Blayney [Visitor]
Congratulations must go to christopher, well done!
Permalink 10th May 2005 @ 20:23
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
Yep, was thinking of running a quick post later just to say congratulations. Not my personal choice, but all the best nonetheless.
Permalink 10th May 2005 @ 21:10
Comment from: Stalford [Visitor]
Andy

Thanks very much! e-mail me some time!
Permalink 27th May 2005 @ 12:34
Comment from: Adam Shanks [Visitor]
I think Christopher only has Ulster at heart, and thats good enough for me.
Well done mucker!

Forza Northern Ireland!

Adam
Permalink 1st June 2005 @ 00:05
Comment from: Stalford [Visitor] · http://www.dup.org.uk
Thank you Adam!
Permalink 3rd June 2005 @ 17:49
Comment from: Andrew Blayney [Visitor]
Christopher, don't have your email address. Would you drop me a line at aib1@st-and.ac.uk ?

Would be good to hear from you.
Permalink 11th June 2005 @ 18:26

Archives

March 2025
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

Links

Get Firefox!

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution