News Index Last comments Archives Login...Register...

Search

2nd April 2005

Are DUP a Serious Option for Unionists?

Permalink 05:27:10 pm, Categories: Northern Ireland, Politics, 509 words  

ANOTHER attempt to DUPe Unionists appeared in today's Newsletter. At the same time as some DUP supporters liberally accuse the Ulster Unionists of arrogance, it was interesting to read Christopher Salford's article, in which he tries to frighten the unionist electorate into voting for his party. He writes a Newsletter article called "DUP are only serious option for unionists." (If that isn't arrogance... what is?)

I beg the question, far from the only serious option - are the DUP a serious option at all?

What Salford is basically saying is "If you don't vote for us, Sinn Fein have won," going on to warn that if voters don't "rally to the DUP" we should "prepare for a very smug Gerry Adams on May 6." I'm well used to the DUP spouting rubbish like this, but what scares me is that suddenly it seems to be working!

[More:]

He argues that simply because "vast swathes of middle-class Roman Catholic Ulster seem happy voiting for" the murderers' apologists of Sinn Fein, that somehow that means the DUP are entitled to unionists votes. He continues about how doomed the SDLP are and that somehow this translates into the notion that we all have to rush out and vote DUP. I don't know about you, but I will not have Sinn Fein voters dictating who I am going to vote for.

Now's the scary part, Mr Salford asks us to imagine the story being beamed around the world on the day of the count that Sinn Fein/IRA had won the most seats and/or votes in the election. Obviously Unionists must stop this horror. Obviously this means they must vote DUP.

Now I see, silly me! It doesn't matter that the DUP will do nothing to improve Northern Ireland over the life of the next parliament. It doesn't matter that, in reality, Ian Paisley is a walking joke to the outside world (lets face it, do we really want people to think of an old, out of date, right-wing religious fundamentalist nut-case whenever they hear the word unionist? Sinn Fein might, I certainly don't.)

Mr Salford, this is shameful. Attempting to petrify the Unionist electorate into voting for you on the back of something so superficial is a disgrace, but nothing less than I would expect from the party who claim to be ever so hard on terrorists, and yet were inches away from agreeing to a deal that could have seen a former IRA gunman as Northern Ireland's Justice Minister.

Despite all the DUP flag waving and despite all Ian Paisley's bellowing about the "enemies of Ulster" Unionists do have a choice this election time.

- They can choose to vote for religious fundamentalists espousing 'politcal Protestantism' rather than Unionism.
- They can choose to vote for slogans and buzz words hiding an appeasement agenda.
- They can choose to vote for a party built around one man's ego.

Or they can vote for the Ulster Unionists.

Source: Newsletter, 2nd April, Page 22 - 'DUP are only serious option for unionists' (No link available)

Comments:

Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
Further to the above article, I've just found out Stalford is the DUP Association Vice Chairman for my constituency... there's the DUP candidate DEFINITELY not getting my vote in May then, don't want anyone in who's even remotely connected to this clown.
Permalink 2nd April 2005 @ 17:41
Comment from: Paul [Visitor] · http://www.nimagyar.blogspot.com
"He argues that simply because "vast swathes of middle-class Roman Catholic Ulster seem happy voiting for" the murderers' apologists of Sinn Fein, that somehow that means the DUP are entitled to unionists votes"

As far as I'm aware,the election hasn't actually taken place yet and unless Christopher's crystall ball is better than mine, how do we know which way the Nationalist middle-class will vote?

My main gripe with the DUP is their refusal to believe that there are Roman Catholics who given the correct circumstances may vote for the Union.
What they will not do is vote for a cause which they belive to be still steeped in sectarianism.
DUP are employing the old "Vote us to keep out the Romanists" and in 2005 this is not what Unionism needs.
Permalink 3rd April 2005 @ 14:54
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
Couldn't agree more. The term "Political Protestantism" was used in yesterday's Newsletter to describe the values they espouse (rather than unionism), and I tend to agree!
Permalink 3rd April 2005 @ 15:20
Comment from: Robert [Visitor]
there are some valid points in your article beano. Certainly at times the DUP are just espousing political protestantism which has no place in todays politics. This can be an embarressment for unionis.

You are very critical of the DUP on points which i think are very unfair. I think for example that the DUP do at least work very hard for their constituents and improve peoples lives in a meaningful hands on way. Id trust a DUP politican to work hard on my behalf and do what i asked of him before a UUP politician, Maybe thats because i live in Trimbles constituency and whatever else you think of him he is a terrible comstituency MP who probably sets foot in his cinstituency once a year if we're lucky. Obviously there are examples where the opposite is true im sure but generally i think the DUP are good for local matters. They may however not improve the overall political situation, that remains to be seen.

Also i think there are some in the DUP who wish to move on for from the Paisley brand of politics. there are those with a more modern take on unionism and i think they should be acknowledged for the efforts they make t move on the situation

I havent decided how to vote in the election yet. I was set on voting DUP but now they are basically collaborators with the agreement and unionists oppossed to sharing government with armed republicans are left with little choice
Permalink 4th April 2005 @ 23:32
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
Robert, I bow to your superior knowledge on the level of constituency activity in Upper Bann, but I would imagine that most party leaders spend less time in their constituency than ordinary members, no?

I make no secret of my dislike for the DUP, because any time I see/hear anything about them it's usually something that makes me embarrassed to be a Unionist. In this case, my gripe was with this whole article which was blatant scaremongering and negative in the extreme. There may well be members of the DUP intent on leaving Paisleyism behind (I'd like to think Mr Donaldson was one), but I wish to god they'd hurry up and do something about it!
Permalink 6th April 2005 @ 01:40
Comment from: Needia [Visitor]
"He argues that simply because "vast swathes of middle-class Roman Catholic Ulster seem happy voiting for" the murderers' apologists of Sinn Fein, that somehow that means the DUP are entitled to unionists votes"
Nice to see that 5 years into the 21st Century, political and religous categories can be used interchangibly.
'DUP- We stand for Ulster traditions.'
My main gripe with the DUP is their refusal to believe that there are Roman Catholics who given the correct circumstances may vote for the Union.
If there were ever a referendum, and all the practical issues were put alongside the flag-waving buzz words, most people would vote for things to stay as they are (If that was what you meant by 'Union').
Permalink 6th April 2005 @ 17:43
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
Agree with you on the first point needia, hence my fondness for the term "political protestantism" to describe the DUP's attitudes (I can't really bring myself to call them policies).

On point 2, currently Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom (the Union) so yes remaining the same would constitute support for that Union. I also agree with you on this that the figures seem to bare out that most people would vote in favour of the status quo for whatever reason. My point in my post was that the DUP seem to ignore this and try to equate unionism with protestantism, something which doesn't sit easily with me as an atheist/agnostic.
Permalink 6th April 2005 @ 17:53
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
It seems this artcile was briefly the number one ranked site in google for the phrase vote DUP. Unfortunately it was taken over by another article on A Tangled Web yesterday, only a day after I realised! :(
Permalink 18th April 2005 @ 09:56

Archives

April 2026
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Links

Get Firefox!

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution