News Index Last comments Archives Login...Register...

Search

12th April 2005

Trimble: No Sinn Fein Power Sharing for 'Foreseeable Future'

Permalink 09:48:43 pm, Categories: News, Northern Ireland, Politics, Election 2005, 347 words  

DAVID Trimble said today that there couldn't be executive power sharing with Sinn Fein any time soon. His statement echoed what he said at last months centenary Ulster Unionist AGM:

[More:]

"In our view the Unionist electorate would not support, or tolerate now or in the foreseeable future the formation of an Executive that would include Sinn Fein.
...we do not intend to re-enter an Executive that includes Sinn Fein. If republicans wish to be included in talks then it must rebuild its credibility by doing all the things it should have done and present itself as a purely peaceful democratic movement with no private army."

Some have interpreted these remarks as "Never, never, never" as the Ulster Unionists try to out-DUP the DUP. To be fair to Trimble, this has been UU policy since before January (presumably since David Trimble and the Ulster Unionists left the assembly and forced its suspension in October 2002).

It should be noted that he did not, as some have tried to claim, say the UUs would never share power with Sinn Fein. What he said is that they must give up their private army first, and become a normal, democratic, political party. You can hardly blame him for ruling it out for the foreseeable future; after previous emtpy gestures and meaningless statements, unionists need to be persuaded that any action taken by the IRA in relation to disbanding is sincere and not just a cynical political ploy.

Trimble later stated that he believed the IRA would make a significant statement in the next few days, which is in stark contrast to what Gerry Adams said to the Londonderry Chamber of Commerce yesterday, ie that he didn't see the IRA responding in the coming weeks.

Despite what both Trimble and Adams say, call me cynical but I personally see a response coming just in time for election day. Would any of us really be surprised? This would surely only add weight to unionist suspicions that any statement would only be a cynical ploy for political gain: its actions we need, not words.

Comments:

Comment from: Diarmid Logan [Visitor] · http://irishtribesman.blogspot.com/
So Trimble believes that he has the right to invalidate the votes of the indigenous Irish Catholic population of the Six Counties?
Permalink 15th April 2005 @ 14:29
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
I think you misinterpret the meaning of power sharing Diarmid. Does George Bush share power* with the democrats? No. Is he invalidating the votes of their supporters by not doing so?

He is also not ruling out power sharing with nationalists or catholics on grounds of their political beliefs, only Sinn Fein/the IRA on the grounds that they, as an active terrorist organisation, are clearly still a viable threat to peace and stability in Northern Ireland.

* - for any Americans in our ranks, the sharing of power does not mean the taking of seats in the legislature, which all elected MLAs are perfectly entitled to do (on the odd occasion it's up and running). The mandatory power sharing referred to is the process of dishing out seats in the executive/cabinet, something which is entirely different.

The current unionist propsal is to form a voluntary coalition between all the parties that aren't representatives of terrorists and who have sufficient votes to be given seats in the executive. Something much more akin to most European models, including the southern Irish government system, than the one we were proscribed under the Good Friday Agreement.
Permalink 16th April 2005 @ 12:10

Archives

May 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Links

Get Firefox!

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution