News Index Last comments Archives Login...Register...

Search

21st April 2005

SDLP Manifesto Launch

Permalink 01:26:53 am, Categories: News, Northern Ireland, Politics, Election 2005, United Kingdom, 1441 words  

THE SDLP launched their manifesto yesterday. I haven't been able to get a hold of the document (their website's been a bit screwed today as far as I can tell) but the BBC published a summary report. Let's see what we've got....

[More:]

According to the BBC report, issues discused in the SDLP manifesto are:

  • Bringing in a new sectarian and hate crimes act to tackle incitement to hatred on the internet and through the display of flags or graffiti, and football terrace chanting
    Fair enough - though I wonder how easy it will be to control football terrace chanting. As for trying to censor the internet - good luck. I worry a bit about the internet, eg will publishers end up being held responsible for forum posts or blog comments? This is fairly typical election fudge and needs explained more. I'm not sure what's wrong with the current laws.
  • Convening a victims and survivors' forum to design a truth remembrance process and ensure assets recovered from criminal and paramilitary gangs are diverted to victims' groups
    Like the idea of diverting funds to victims groups from the ARA - some sort of poetic justice in that. Not sure how constructive any rememberence process would be. First we have to uncover the truth, then decide which version we'll take, and then get over it and move on. Is this likely in Northern Ireland?
  • Advancing police personnel exchanges with the Irish Republic's police in areas such as serious crime, drugs, community policing, criminal assets, fingerprinting, ethical standards and training
    Anything that'll help catch more of the scummier elements of our community, if it expands the cross-community appeal of the Police Force, even better.
  • Creating a fair rates system based on ability to pay
    Local income tax anyone? Sounds like blandly appealing to as many people as possible by being as unspecific as possible.
  • Opposing the privatisation of water services and creation of a government-owned water company, domestic metering and water charges
    What's wrong with domestic metering? Firstly it would encourage people to use less, which unless I'm mistaken is a good thing! Is that a bandwagon I hear? Does anyone seriously think any of the local parties are going to do anything about this?
  • Campaigning for the adoption of the euro by the British government
    They've got to be kidding! A party who spends their whole time talking about a 'Better Ireland' and wants out of the UK wants to tell the government they should hand over financial control to the EU, possibly the least democratic and most corrupt political entity in the Western world?
  • Ensuring primary healthcare services are well funded with a real partnership between GPs and other health professionals
    I've got a sudden craving for fudge. Could it be due to a another wishy washy, unquantifiable promise that they can't really be challenged on?
  • Allocating significant funds to acute hospital services for Tyrone and Mid-Ulster
    Don't know enough about health care in the sticks to comment.
  • Securing free nursing care for the elderly
    Not without merit. Would need more info on this to comment.
  • Widening access to third level education, targeting low-income families and dedicating extra spending to those with disabilities, students with dependants and mature students
    Great idea. I'd like to know what they're going to do to attract the under represented in higher education in Northern Ireland - the working class protestant.
  • Investing in schools and opposing efforts to use new pupil profiles as a means of back door selection
    Ballocks to this. Just have selection by post code instead where people move near the good schools, sending house prices soaring so only the rich end up going there?!
  • Replacing A-levels with a broader post-16 curriculum
    Oh, gee, something similar to the Irish model perhaps? What's the idea of the SDLP ever proposing changes that aren't based on what Ireland do? As for A-levels, the French have a baccalaureate which is broader than our system, kind of like a general high school diploma I think. Guess what though... they're investigating changing to an A-level type system. In countries with generic high school educations and final qualifications, students at university have to spend an extra year learning the basics we already get in high school! If it ain't broke...
  • Investing in public transport, enabling bus and rail services to meet their passenger charter standards and delivering long-term growth as well as securing capital investment for the Belfast to Londonderry rail-link
    Finally something I agree on. I'm fully in support of public transport but it has to be of good quality, particularly the rail network which is atrocious and also round the commuter belt on the outskirts of the city. Just ask any UUJ students from Lisburn direction about how long it takes to get to university by train.
    And I'm sure the SDLP didn't really say Londonderry.
  • Devising an aviation strategy for Northern Ireland and guarantee air access to Heathrow for planes from the province
    Maybe I've missed something but why should our planes get priority access over others? I think the first priority of any aviation strategy should be to rename the City of Derry Airport to something more inclusive.
  • Expanding rural transport initiatives, particularly demand responsive services like community taxis and "rural rover" bus services
    Yeah go for it, assuming that there's a demand of course.
  • Investing in community sport, encouraging greater physical activity among the population and implementing a strategic development plan for gaelic games and rugby.
    Certainly. Particularly I think they should encourage people, like myself, who are shit at sports and grossly unfit to compete in rejects leagues just for the fun of it. Why does football not get a strategic development game though?
  • Producing a new Irish language act offering full recognition of the language
    :D Are they having a laugh? I've said it before and I'll say it again - more people in Northern Ireland speak Mandarin than Irish! Based on a 1987 survey (discussed at Eurolang)and the 2001 census, the best guestimate I can come up with is that around 2% of the population use Irish on a daily or occasional basis, and I feel that is being very generous. Approximately 4% claim to be able to 'speak, read, write and understand Irish' according to the 2001 census. The fact that the SDLP waste time on such issues disgusts me. The Irish language would be much better served if people stopped trying to pretend it was a means of communication and confined it to cultural and historic contexts, as it is there where the language has real meaning.
    As a curiosity, I discovered single people are more likely to speak Irish - coincidence?

So anyway, what can we take from this? Not a lot really. It's weak and fudgey, I expect like a lot of the manifesto's from local parties. Promises of trying to do things they can't really do or can't be called to account on by virtue that there is no metric of success/failure and of course the obligatory 'green' policies - no, not saving the environment - copying Irish systems in Northern Ireland, and of course, my friend, the Irish language (of which I think I shall post more on after the election).

Oh and posters seemed to spring up at the Westlink in Belfast proclaiming the SDLP's election slogan "A Better Way to a Better Ireland," and the first thing I noticed was their obsession with getting the term Ireland everywhere. It was bad enough when they talked about the North of Ireland, at least then we knew they were talking about something remotely relevant, even if they insisted on denying reality. But this latest pandering to republican mythology that Northern Ireland doesn't exist is just another example of SDLP desperation.

Could all these attempts to appear ultra green be Mark Durkan's downfall? As was pointed out to me today by Pakman @ Slugger O'Toole, "if your survival as party leader depended on courting 9000 unionist voters in your constituency you would have thought it might be wise to leave the fourth green field crap to the Shinners."

I'd like to see the SDLP do well, simply because I want to believe that those who disagree with my views on the potential annexing of Ulster by the Irish Republic don't feel the need to kill me to get their way. That said, their manifesto doesn't enspire me with confidence and I fear that they, with the Ulster Unionists, will fare badly in this election and the question on my mind is how they will reinvent themselves afterwards, as they will doubtless have to do in order to recover.

Comments:

Comment from: Hugh Green [Visitor] · http://mostsincerelyfolks.blogspot.com
beano,

You're doing some good work here. I don't know how you can muster the enthusiasm.

On this:

Could all these attempts to appear ultra green be Mark Durkan's downfall?

Yes: It's totally unconvincing. SF looms large. All this 'we are the true republicans' stuff is unlikely to appeal to anyone wavering between SDLP and SF. If anything, it shows the SDLP to be lacking any real conviction.

The 'cherishing all children of the nation equally' crap makes me wanna barf. You can tell that some of them don't really believe it, (nothing wrong with that: I don't either) and it comes across as a tacit admission that they are in SF's shadow and fading fast.
Permalink 21st April 2005 @ 10:56
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
Thanks for the positive comments there Hugh. Part of my reason for doing this is that I'm learning at the same time - partly about blogging and the particular software I use (b2evolution) - mostly about politics in Northern Ireland.

I studied politics at A-level, but since beginning uni a few years ago now, I haven't heard that much about local politics. For example I'd no idea who Michael McGimpsey was (well except he was the former Sports minister in the asembly). By the end of the election, I'll know a bit more about every constituency in Northern Ireland thanks to my Westminster Focus posts.

So that's my motivation/enthusiasm covered.

As for the sdlp, I'm a bit depressed with them. It's a sad state of affairs that Sinn Fein, who bombed and murdered their way into power for 30 years have managed to convince even moderate(ish) nationalists that they're a credible political party. I think it's not unfair to say that this in part is responsible for the rise of the DUP in recent years too, which is equally depressing.

Let's hope post-election the sdlp (and indeed the Ulster Unionists) come up with something new and original - this country needs fresh ideas and fast!
Permalink 21st April 2005 @ 11:32
Comment from: Julian Robertson [Visitor]
How are the SDLP going to do all this with maybe one MP and a government formed by the Labour or Conservative Party? We have no Assembly and this election is for Westminster anyway. All tis should be prefaced with "will lobby for" cos that is all they can do. Ditto the rest too. Its easy to come out with any amount of grand aspirational nonsense when you don't actually have to implement any of it and lets face it, with the SDLP refusing to back devolution without SF being involved, they aren't going to get the chance to implement anything for quite some time!

Permalink 21st April 2005 @ 17:10
Comment from: Steven [Visitor]
Doesn't matter what manifesto the SDLP produce, they will lose votes and seats to Sinn Fein in this election, all over NI
Permalink 26th April 2005 @ 17:14
Comment from: stephen [Visitor]
the juxtaposition of the sdlp isnt lost on me, for one.

How can they ridicule sfira, and then at the next breath say there cannot be a government without them?

Completely contradictory and nonsensical.
Permalink 27th April 2005 @ 16:03
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
They denounce some of the policies of SF because they are outdated and unhelpful and they want to persuade the nationalist community that the SDLP are better suited to fighting their corner.

They insist there can't be government without them, presumably because they represent the majority of the nationalist community and throwing them out would lead to the SDLP to be seen as 'siding' with the Unionists and the SDLP would then be destroyed by their voters. That would leave Sinn Fein as potentially the biggest party in Northern Ireland - do any of us want that?

I think that deep down the SDLP would like to join a coalition without SF but they know that they can't without risking almost certain extinction.
Permalink 27th April 2005 @ 20:05
Comment from: stephen [Visitor]
Yes, I know that, but from a Unionist point, I can turn this argument around.
I ask nationalists, why vote for sfira?
Apart from terrorism, and crime etc, sf will not take their seats in westminster, and thus give no representation.
Secondly, they will not be included in any new executive. Surely nationalsits should vote for the sdlp as then we have a chance to form an executive with sdlp, uup, and dup, and leave sf behind.
tHE OTHER MORE PERTINENT POINT IS, THE SDLP HAVE ALWAYS USED THE THREAT OF THE IRA TO THEIR ADVANTAGE, AND AHHH shit, done it again, anyway, and they have shown reluctance to go into government, with a strange refusal to obey democracy, which is, after all, majority rule.
Permalink 29th April 2005 @ 19:08
Comment from: beano [Member] · http://www.everythingulster.com
Democracy is the rule of the people, that in itself does not imply majority rule (although I see some dictionary definitions define it as just that).

I always try to understand the nationalist mindset, so here goes my shot at understanding why they vote SF:

Some, obviously do not see the IRA as criminals and think they really were fighting a just cause (superb PR job by Sinn Fein on that one, and a rather awful one by the Unionists, particularly in the past). Often they will have been suckered in by the general MOPEry that Sinn Fein abuse so well - and unionists, particularly hard liners, must share the blame for allowing them this coup.

Some genuinely see Adams and McGuinness as brave men sticking their neck on the line for 'peace in our time,' in an attempt to bring the republican movement into a democratic arena.

Finally, some, how many I can't say, are just downright bigots who will accept nothing but the eradication of Unionist 'false consciousness' (or maybe Unionists themselves) from Northern Ireland and see Sinn Fein as the most likely way to achieve their 32-county mono-ethnic, mono-cultural state, seeing no problem employing violence to achieve that.

I'm not sure I understand your comment about the SDLP using the threat of IRA violence so I can't reply on that.
Permalink 29th April 2005 @ 21:07

Archives

February 2026
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28  

Links

Get Firefox!

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution