| « What's in a Name? | Cost/Benefit Analysis of Devolution » |
About That Stadium
It's been a busy few weeks for those following the debate over the national stadium plans for the Maze.
A matter of a couple of weeks before Peter Robinson is due to make his 'recommendation' to the Executive over the Maze plans, it has emerged John Sweeney, the Permanent Secretary of DCAL ( the deparment headed by Edwin Poots, the Maze's head cheerleader - nothing to do with the fact that the Maze is practically in his back garden of course), has refused to endorse DCAL's assessment of the plans. A senior civil servant is quoted as saying the Maze proposal "doesn't stack up" and that adding the extra 8,500 seats to the original 30,000 doubled the expected costs.
This comes only a couple of weeks after a report identified no less than 5 potential sites for a stadium in Belfast that it says are "better suited" to hosting a large sports stadium.
Those potential sites are Maysfield Leisure Centre, Ormeau Park and the North Foreshore (nothing new there) as well as relative newcomer Danny Blanchflower and, out of nowhere, Boucher Road playing fields.
The week before that, the Amalgamation of Northern Ireland Supporters Clubs released a highly critical response to the PwC business case for the Maze, which was finally released at the start of this year after what seemed like years of waiting.
Trackback address for this post
9 comments
Even poor old Reg Empey has come under fire with Lisburn UUP councillors threatening to no confidence him and resign the whip in support of the SF/IRA terror dome.
Estimated costs for the project have been quoted at around £75 million - less than a third of the estimated cost of the maze
On a broader scale I think it significantly weakens the case of the Executive when they go cap in hand to the Treasury. We don't have a strong argument when we squander the vast sums of money we already have on white elephants such as this. When you think of the problems the NHS is going to face here because spending is only rising at two thirds the level in England and Wales you have to wonder what our MLAs priorities are, and whether their bleats a Northern Ireland Government would be more responsive to our needs than a Westminster one.
Even if Peter Robinson goes against Edwin Poots, and stops the building of the Maze stadium, Sinn Féin will stop Robinson from building a new stadium anywhere in Northern Ireland.
Face it, the Sinners' interests in this are purely political and purely motivated by the 'extras' they think they can get tagged on to the site. To be fair, much of the unionist inhabitants of Stormont don't seem much better.
There's not a single good sporting or economic argument to build this monstrosity at the Maze, but as you said, I'm sure that won't stop the Sinners from stomping and screaming anyway. Unfortunately for them, as I said elsewhere, the Assembly might not necessarily get a say if Belfast City Council can pull their finger out and sort something out, and I don't think the SF reps on the council are numerous enough to prevent it should the rest of the council back it.
You've provided the strongest case against a Maze stadium, that the reason it was chose has nothing to do with giving taxpayers value for money or sport but politics. It says alot about SF and the SDLPs suitability for government if there are prepared to squander tens of millions of pounds for a shrine to terrorists.
It also says a lot about the UUP and DUP's suitability for government, as the only reason the majority of them disagree with the Maze is because of the Conflict Transformation Centre. Unionist Politician's opposition to the Maze has nothing to do with sport.
Secondly, most supporters of Sinn Féin do not have a problem with Tax Payers money being used to protect Republican history, so I have no problem with the Conflict Transformation Centre. Let's remember that the State pays millions to commemorate the Security Forces.
Personally, as I have already stated at other occasions, that my problem with this new stadium isn't the location, it's the actual stadium itself. Divide the money, given Casement Park 1/3 of it, give Windsor Park 1/3 and give Ravenhill 1/3 of the it, and enough of this Political Correct bollocks of us all playing happily together.
Would you still be so proud of Sinn Fein's stubborn refusal to do what they know is right for sport?
And I almost* agree with you about the unionist politicians by the way. There are enough reasons to oppose the Maze that it shouldn't have taken them to wake up to the terror-shrine to make up their minds.
* I say almost because I think foregoing something you want in order to prevent something you find so repugnant is more justifiable than refusing others something they want, which is inoffensive (the stadium), unless they cede to your demands for something you know is abhorrent to them. That's really another debate I suppose, but I just want to point out that there are a lot of Unionist MLAs who have been found lacking on this front, (with a handful of exceptions).
"Seamus, what if, hypothetically, the football and rugby thirds were combined to build a new purpose-built stadium in Belfast (with the GAA spending their third how they see fit, naturally)?"
The only problem I would have with it would be the chance of a clash in matches. What if Ulster has a match the same night that Northern Ireland has a match? Who gets the priority? As an Ulster fan, I wouldn't want Ulster Rugby to have to concede to the Northern Ireland football team. Other than that I wouldn't have a problem.
In terms of the CTC, it represents an important part of our history. Auschwitz still remains, despite the horror that happened there and the negative connotations that it represents (I am not comparing Holocaust victims to Republican POWs). To prevent the creation of the CTC at the Maze just because Unionists are afraid of it becoming a Republican shrine, is just as wrong as not decommissioning just because the IRA was afraid that Unionists will gloat about it.
