| « Troops Out | 'Historic' IRA Statement "Ends Armed Campaign" » |
Responses to the IRA Statement
Well so far responses from senior politicians haven't been entirely unpredictable. The governments are practically throwing a party for Gerry and the Widowmakers, Peter Hain warns Unionists not to doubt the sincerity of his buddies in the IRA or else they're bad, bad people standing in the way of peace and questions are asked as to whether this means the IRA will finally accept the legitimate police service and allow them to get on with their jobs of protecting our communities.
The worst offence was probably continuous references by republicans to the "Sinn Fein peace strategy." WHAT THE HELL? It's damn easy to create a peace strategy when you're the one holding the guns!
You can't blame normal people for being sceptical. We've had 7 years of statements and promises from the IRA that have amounted to very little. In 1994 there was a "complete cessation" and within 3 years they were bombing Manchester.
Anyway, rant over, let's see what the powers that be had to say...
Follow up:
Peter Hain is already planning the return of devolution and legislation to enact the removal of the legitimate armed forces from Northern Ireland and to allow on-the-run gangsters to return to Northern Ireland. Chris Thornton at the Belfast Telegraph meanwhile accuses Peter Hain of making a huge blunder in letting Sean Kelly out and ruining any chance of the IRA statement meaning anything to unionists.
Ian Paisley, DUP
"We will judge the IRA's bona fides over the next months and years based on its behaviour and activity.Even on the face of the statement they have failed to explicitly declare an end to their multi-million pound criminal activity and have failed to provide the level of transparency that would be necessary to truly build confidence that the guns have gone in their entirety.
This lack of transparency will prolong the period the community will need to make its assessment.
We treat with contempt their attempt to glorify and justify their murder campaign and we will be evaluating the extent of the price paid by the government and the consequences that will have for the political process."
While it sounds harsh I find it hard to disagree. The IRA may or may not end their criminal gangsterism.
There will be a lack of transparnecy in any decommissioning.
They did give a contemptuous "We are very mindful of the sacrifices of our patriot dead, those who went to jail, Volunteers," and "We reiterate our view that the armed struggle was entirely legitimate."
Actions not words.
Mark Durkan, SDLP
"The SDLP hopes that, as promised, all IRA paramilitary activity and all IRA involvement in organised crime will end now and for good - as well as the culture of cover up and community control.It has to be noted that today's statement does not commit to the provisional movement to policing. Yet policing is fundamental to accepting the rule of law and vital to tackle organised crime.
The SDLP calls on Sinn Fein to join with us in upholding the new beginning to policing."
Denis Bradley, Vice Chairman, Policing Board
"This is enormous within the history of this island. Will Sinn Fein now take their responsibility and their place in policing and justice?"
Good question. Without the provies to 'police' republican areas, that only leaves a choice of dissident republicans likely to undermine what the IRA say they are trying to do, or the police. Well...?
Reg Empey
"People are so sceptical, having had...been burnt so many times before.This is not simply whinging or being difficult about it, it's being simply factual that we've had so many statements before that haven't been kept.
And as far as the whole criminality is concerned, I mean, there are huge multi-million-pound smuggling rackets that have been run by the IRA, the bank robbery that was only recently held at the Northern Bank, which was the largest in British history, so, you know, people are going to take some time to see.
Basically what I said earlier, we'll wait and see what happens. More or less what Paisley said, although phrased a little less confrontationally.
Tony Blair
"Today may be the day that peace replaced war, that politics replaced terror, on the island of Ireland.It is what we have striven for and worked for throughout the eight years since the Good Friday Agreement.
It creates the circumstances in which the institutions can be revived"
I beg your pardon? The island of Ireland? I know you're having a love-in with Gerry and Friends right now but don't resort to their loaded lingo. And a statement doesn't create circumstances in which anything can happen, actions (or the lack thereof) may do that.
Like the Good Friday Agreement, everyone's taking what they want from this, ignoring the IRA's maintenance that it's 35 years of war and bloodshed against the people of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was somehow justified and legitimate, nor that the IRA seemingly hasn't renounced it's 'right' to return to the "armed struggle" if their mouthpieces in Sinn Fein don't get everything their own way at the negotiating table.
Can't you just feel the hand of history on your shoulder?
Trackback address for this post
10 comments, 1 trackback
The SDLP have came out of the shadows and given their view piont, they stayed very quiet during the sean kelly arrest and release!!
The good friday agreement is now dead and has failed!!! a united ireland is many years away yet gerry...
Stevey, I don't believe Trimble would have said anything different to what came out today. And from what I heard Empey's statement pre-empted Paisley's but I could be wrong on that.
"a united ireland is many years away yet gerry..."
It's more than "many years away," it's as much a pipe-dream today as it ever was.
It doesnt help when protestants are attacking themselves!!!
Well, trimble went into government with sinn fein/ira 3 times without any confident decommissioning, why would he not do the same now!!!
totalitarian '1916 proclamation'), indeed they have made it perfectly clear that no humanitarian concerns were taken when the took this decision, they clearly state that the only reason their interested in this is as an avenue to pursue the same goal they have always had, this means that this move has nothing to do with compromise or reconciliation, or laying the foundations for a mutually inclusive society, they simply want to use a political vehicle for the same extremist, racially centred state they always did.
Whilst the British government pander to this without any pressure being put on reform with the Republican movement (and the recognition of the moral bankruptcy of militantism throughout the conflict) we are simply in a position where peace has been brought about, not through compromise and mutual acknowledgement of responsibility, but by succeeding to the demands of one party on the condition that they withhold from violence, not condemn it. This irresponsible approach can only disenfranchise the people further as they see their suffering ignored an their sacrifices for freedom robbed of any value, in accepting the I.R.A.'s 'right to exist' - surely the Brits are doing just that,( the authority to do so was gained unfairly in the disestablishment of Ulster's defence services). Blair's government must value the humanity and right to grievance with the Republic of the Protestant people before any truthful reconciliation can occur, by pandering to a political view point many Labourites will find stimulating in spite of it’s a-moral character, they polarise this process and leave it open to abuses S.F. have made it clear is their only interest, with potently disastrous consequences.
We must also consider the line taken by our soon to be head of state, the Rev. Ian Paisley, although morally his stance is honest and correct (and his language as always an unmitigated disaster),: we must accept that under successive British governments the generally presented composition of the talks is false (i.e. the Republicans and the Government of the Republic in one corner and the Unionists and the English government in the other) we cannot rely on our situation being sympathised with or our peoples commitment being truly honoured, the whole process and the 'responsible' bodies are now fully geared up to legitimise and empower an entirely unreformed (withstanding the aesthetic of its murder machine) Republican movement. At some point we are going to have to bite the bullet and realise we have to face the multi-million pound international racket of Republicanism on our own, this is unfair given the multitude of support our now-political opponents have, but its reality (for now). If we stick together and face them head on in the (still admittedly much more level and fair than covert, cowardly terror) political plain , I think it could be a dynamic and exiting time for our community , imagine a break with the old style politics of conflict survival through confrontation and intransigence being replaced with a politics centred on the revitalisation of our beautiful and wise culture as a method of survivalist politics (which is still the game we are in) as means of making sure our children grow up in a state where our peoples way of life and shared morals and perceptions are relevant and honoured, I feel the best way
we can do this is through a 'charm offensive' gaining the support of our migrant cousins over seas and representing ourselves in an appealing light on the international stage, we have to show our traditional way of life is wholesome and good and has infinitely more right to exist ,in dignified independence from any National-social Republican entity, and the way to gain a voice is go to where the microphones are,ie around Gerry,which is when we will have to swollow hard and challenge them directly in Stormount, we have no choice as if we leave our affairs with tony,well, you can see for yoursevles I'm sure, (I reiterate S.F.'s clearly stated commitment to their constant immoral objective in their statement), than S.F. and the forth coming puerile 'conflict nostalgia' and community /emotional manipulation form of politics they will blatantly and irresponsibly pursue. We have to turn in the face of the Green (propaganda) machine and struggle for the truth and fairness.
This brings me to the end of my uber-rant
and onto the point of the medias handling of the situation (did any of catch the 6 o’clock on channel 4 , we all seen Tony use provie catch phrases but did you hear John Snow and his "who won?" and do you think it" (i.e. the violence and terror) " was necessary to bring things to this point?" and the cracker "the I.R.A. who for 30 years fought British police and Troops....." did we forget the sectarian ethnic cleansing then John ?He made no mention of the campaign against civillians."Physical force Republicanism†was another hum dinger. What I said above relates to my feelings on how we can move forward by copying the Republicans in terms of popularism, however the sore , blatant and offensive (given the disrespect shown to our communities immense suffering) bias being trumpet out be certain media companies, with surprising vigour, almost as if they were waiting for the slightest trace of legitimacy from S.F. so they could (with fear of significant reproach from a threatened and attacked in the past English public) jump on the romantic struggle band wagon and help to reinforce an inaccurate view of the conflict,it is grossly irresponsible and hurtful in that they should feel so little compassion for victims (of any creed) , and effectively back what is still an oppressive, sectarian and extremist movement, and they could well grow to hurt us badly if we don’t offer a more factual, accessible and responsible outlook in the few platforms of expression we have, but that’s another rant. Leftwing media have an I.R.A bias which is grossly irresponsible in any but especially the current context, which must be about mutual inclusion and forgiveness, something I have not seen an ounce of as yet, (indeed all I see in our community is directionless ness and disenfranchisement, a situation the Labour government is exacerbating), as opposed to an early Christmas for Gerry and Martian, they haven’t been good boys and what they want isn’t very nice either. Thanks to anyone who read this (I had a lot to get off my chest, and sorry about the length Beano (it’s the hand of history I feel, although it’s certainly not on my shoulder...............))
Protestants who pass their exams for the psni are being refused entry, to take a member of the other community who has faield theirs!!1
imagine the protection rackets you could get on the go if the authorities to keep people safe from that sort of thing was,um... you.
Decent Catholic officers and commisoners ? a thousand times yes!
P.C. P O'Neil? - a certain disaster for us all......
As pointed out earlier on EU and already blogged elsewhere the Romeo 12 watchtower in South Armagh's bandit country is being dismantled as I type. It seems little has changed for our Tony-appointed lord and master Peter Hain since his days in the "Troo...
